Rx Prescripttion Only-YMYL Medical Content

Pazorest 200 mg

Pazopanib Hydrochloride 200mg tablets – Everest Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Approved for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma (kidney cancer / RCC) and for adults with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who have received prior chemotherapy — excluding adipocytic STS and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), which are not covered by this indication.

11.1 mo

Median PFS in advanced RCC vs 2.8 mo placebo (VEG105192 Phase III trial)

Non-inf.

Non-inferior OS vs sunitinib in RCC head-to-head (COMPARZ trial, n=1,110)

4.6 mo

Median PFS in advanced soft tissue sarcoma vs 1.6 mo placebo (PALETTE trial)

Once

Daily oral dosing — single daily dose convenience vs twice-daily alternatives

1

Confirm cancer type and treatment setting
For RCC — advanced or metastatic disease, first-line or after prior therapy; for STS — advanced disease after prior chemotherapy. Confirm that STS subtype is not adipocytic sarcoma or GIST, which are excluded from the indication.

2

Assess baseline liver function — critical before starting
Liver enzymes (ALT, AST) and bilirubin must be checked before starting and monitored regularly — 92.5% of all transaminase elevations occur within the first 18 weeks. Pre-existing moderate hepatic impairment requires dose reduction to 200mg daily.

3

Review cardiovascular and QTc history
Cardiac dysfunction, hypertension, QTc prolongation, and arterial thrombotic events have occurred — baseline ECG, blood pressure, and left ventricular function assessment are part of the pre-treatment workup.

4

Review current medications — especially simvastatin
Concomitant use of pazopanib with simvastatin significantly increases the risk of liver enzyme elevation and should be used with caution or switched to an alternative statin. CYP3A4 interactions affect pazopanib levels significantly.
Important safety information — boxed warning: Pazopanib carries a boxed warning for severe and fatal hepatotoxicity. Liver function must be monitored before starting and regularly throughout treatment. Treatment must be interrupted, dose-reduced, or permanently discontinued based on the severity of liver enzyme elevations. Patients with severe hepatic impairment should not take this medication.

MD

Medical Oncologist Review

Board-certified oncologist · 12+ years in thoracic malignancies

“Pazopanib showed non-inferiority to sunitinib in the COMPARZ trial with a different side-effect profile that many patients find more tolerable — less fatigue and hand-foot reaction, though more liver enzyme elevation. For soft tissue sarcoma, it represented the first new systemic option in decades for many patients. The liver monitoring in the first 18 weeks is non-negotiable — that’s where the hepatotoxicity risk is concentrated.”

Content reviewed against FDA prescribing information, NCCN Guidelines v2.2024, and published Phase III trial data. Last updated June 2026.

Ready to discuss Tagrisso with your care team?

These steps help you have an informed conversation. A confirmed EGFR mutation result is the starting point for any treatment decision.

Questions to ask my healthcare provider

What questions should I ask my oncologist about starting pazopanib?

Here are key questions to bring to your oncologist — the liver monitoring plan and the medication review (especially statins) deserve the most attention before starting, given the boxed warning and the well-characterized 18-week hepatotoxicity window.

Before confirming pazopanib as your treatment

  • Which cancer am I being treated for — advanced RCC or soft tissue sarcoma — and what is my specific subtype? (For STS, confirming it is not adipocytic sarcoma or GIST is important since those subtypes are excluded from the indication.)
  • What prior treatments have I had, and why is pazopanib being recommended now rather than another option?
  • For RCC specifically: has immunotherapy (like nivolumab plus ipilimumab or pembrolizumab plus axitinib) been considered, and if not, why?
  • Are there clinical trials I should know about at this point?

About the boxed warning — liver toxicity

  • Will I have baseline liver function tests (ALT, AST, bilirubin) before starting, and how often will they be checked in the first 18 weeks?
  • What specific liver enzyme levels would trigger a dose interruption, dose reduction, or permanent discontinuation?
  • What symptoms of liver problems — yellowing of skin or eyes, dark urine, severe right-sided abdominal pain, unusual fatigue — should prompt an urgent call versus an ER visit?
  • Do I have any pre-existing liver condition (hepatitis B or C, fatty liver, prior liver damage) that changes my monitoring plan or starting dose?

About the simvastatin interaction — critically important

  • Am I currently taking simvastatin or any other statin for cholesterol?
  • If yes, does my statin need to be switched to a different one (such as pravastatin or rosuvastatin, which have lower interaction risk) before starting pazopanib?
  • Who will manage that switch — my oncologist, primary care doctor, or cardiologist?
  • Are there other medications in my current list that interact significantly with pazopanib through CYP3A4?

About cardiovascular monitoring

  • Will I need a baseline ECG before starting, given the QTc prolongation risk?
  • Do I need a baseline assessment of heart function (echocardiogram or LVEF measurement) given the cardiac dysfunction risk?
  • How often will blood pressure be monitored, and what reading should prompt me to call?
  • Do I have any existing cardiovascular history — previous heart attack, arrhythmia, hypertension — that changes the risk picture?

About dosing and the empty stomach requirement

  • The standard dose is 800mg once daily (four 200mg tablets) — should I take them all at once, and at what time of day?
  • What does the empty stomach requirement mean in practice — how long before or after meals?
  • Can the tablets be split or crushed if swallowing four tablets is difficult? (Splitting is generally not recommended but worth clarifying.)
  • What happens if I miss a dose — should I take it when I remember, or skip it if it’s close to the next dose time?

About managing common side effects

  • Given that diarrhea affects roughly half of patients, should I have anti-diarrheal medication on hand from day one?
  • What blood pressure management plan is in place if hypertension develops — is a new medication likely to be needed?
  • Hair color changes (depigmentation) are common — is this cosmetic only, and does it reverse after stopping treatment?
  • What can help with nausea and appetite loss in the first weeks?

About proteinuria monitoring

  • Will urine protein be monitored during treatment, and how often?
  • What level of protein in urine would prompt a dose change?

About wound healing and surgical planning

  • Do I have any planned procedures or surgery? Pazopanib should be stopped before elective surgery — what is the recommended washout period?
  • If I have a wound that’s slow to heal, how does pazopanib affect that?

About my specific situation

  • Does my kidney function affect my dose or monitoring plan?
  • If I’m of childbearing potential, what contraception is required during and after treatment?
  • How does pazopanib interact with any other current medications beyond the statin question — including supplements, herbal products, or grapefruit?

About response and the longer road

  • What scans or tests will track whether this is working, and on what schedule?
  • For RCC: if pazopanib eventually stops working, what second-line options are available?
  • For STS: given the rarity and diversity of sarcoma subtypes, is there a specialist sarcoma center I should be connected with for second opinions or clinical trial access?
  • Are there patient assistance programs through Novartis if cost is a concern?

A practical tip: Because the liver enzyme elevation risk is heaviest in the first 18 weeks and is the drug’s most serious safety concern, it is worth asking for a written monitoring schedule before you start — specifically which weeks blood tests are planned, what results would trigger a call, and who to contact (oncology nurse, pharmacist, or physician directly) when results come back. Having this in writing removes ambiguity during a period when you’ll be receiving frequent lab results and may not always remember what the thresholds mean.

Compare pazopanib vs sunitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma

This is one of the most directly evidence-based comparisons in the entire kidney cancer treatment landscape — pazopanib and sunitinib were compared head-to-head in the COMPARZ trial, one of the largest oncology non-inferiority trials ever conducted, specifically designed to answer this question.


What they are and how they work

Pazopanib (Votrient)Sunitinib (Sutent)
Drug classMulti-targeted TKIMulti-targeted TKI
Key targetsVEGFR1/2/3, PDGFR-α/β, FGFR, c-KitVEGFR1/2/3, PDGFR-α/β, c-Kit, FLT3, RET, CSF-1R
Approved RCC20092006
ManufacturerNovartisPfizer

Both work through broadly similar anti-angiogenic mechanisms — blocking VEGFR signaling to cut off the blood supply that feeds tumor growth. Sunitinib’s slightly broader kinase profile (including CSF-1R and FLT3) may contribute to some of its distinctive side effects compared to pazopanib.


The COMPARZ trial — the definitive head-to-head

COMPARZ enrolled 1,110 patients with previously untreated advanced clear-cell RCC and randomized them to either pazopanib or sunitinib. This was a non-inferiority design — the pre-specified question was whether pazopanib was at least as good as sunitinib, not whether it was better.

OutcomePazopanibSunitinib
Median PFS8.4 months9.5 months
Median OS28.4 months29.3 months
Objective response rate31%25%

Pazopanib met the non-inferiority criterion for PFS — the confidence intervals crossed the pre-specified threshold — establishing it as a legitimate alternative to sunitinib rather than a step down. The numerical differences in PFS and OS between the two drugs were not statistically significant for superiority in either direction, and the response rate actually numerically favored pazopanib.


Dosing schedule — a meaningful practical difference

PazopanibSunitinib
Dose800mg once daily, continuous50mg once daily, 4 weeks on / 2 weeks off (6-week cycle)
ScheduleContinuous — no planned breaksIntermittent — 2 weeks off every 6 weeks
Food restrictionEmpty stomach requiredCan be taken with or without food

The dosing difference is clinically and psychologically significant. Sunitinib’s 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off schedule gives patients a predictable recovery period every cycle — many patients find this structure helpful for planning activities and recovering from side effects. Pazopanib’s continuous daily dosing means no built-in breaks, but also means side effects tend to be more consistent rather than cycling between worse (on treatment) and better (off treatment).


Side effect comparison — where the real difference lies

This is where COMPARZ’s quality-of-life sub-analyses became as important as the efficacy data:

Side effectPazopanibSunitinib
FatigueLess pronouncedMore pronounced — one of its most disabling features
Hand-foot skin reactionLess commonMore common and often more severe
Myelosuppression (low blood counts)Less commonMore common — particularly thrombocytopenia
Mucositis / mouth soresLess commonMore common
Hair depigmentation / color changeMore common (~38%)Less common
Hepatotoxicity (liver enzyme elevation)More common — boxed warningLess common
HypertensionCommon (~47%)Common — similar incidence
HypothyroidismPresentMore common — thyroid function monitoring essential
DiarrheaCommon (~52%)Common — similar incidence
NauseaCommonCommon

The COMPARZ quality-of-life analyses showed patients on pazopanib reported significantly better fatigue scores, fewer mouth sores, and less hand-foot skin reaction than those on sunitinib — while sunitinib patients had better scores on liver-related measures. A patient-preference study (PISCES) where patients were crossed over between both drugs found that 70% of patients preferred pazopanib over sunitinib when asked, primarily driven by the fatigue and mucositis differences.


The hepatotoxicity trade-off

Pazopanib’s boxed warning for hepatotoxicity represents the most meaningful safety difference between these two drugs. Sunitinib can also cause liver enzyme elevations but at lower rates and without the same severity signal that led to a boxed warning for pazopanib. The concentrated risk in the first 18 weeks of pazopanib treatment means that early monitoring intensity differs substantially from sunitinib’s more distributed monitoring profile.

For a patient with pre-existing liver disease, a hepatitis history, or who is taking simvastatin, this difference may meaningfully favor sunitinib.


Where each fits in the current treatment landscape

It’s important to place this comparison in context: the RCC treatment landscape has shifted considerably since COMPARZ was conducted. Combination immunotherapy regimens — particularly pembrolizumab plus axitinib (KEYNOTE-426), nivolumab plus cabozantinib (CheckMate 9ER), and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CheckMate 214) — have all shown superior outcomes to sunitinib as first-line therapy in intermediate and poor risk patients, and most of them used sunitinib as their comparator.

This means both pazopanib and sunitinib have been somewhat displaced from their former positions as the default first-line choices for most patients — they remain important options, particularly for favorable-risk patients or those who are not candidates for immunotherapy combinations, but the decision between them now often occurs in the context of “which anti-angiogenic agent, as part of which combination or sequence, fits this patient?”


The practical choice between them

When pazopanib vs sunitinib is the relevant comparison for a given patient, the decision typically centers on:

Favor pazopanib when:

  • Fatigue is a major quality-of-life concern
  • The patient wants to avoid mucositis and mouth sores
  • Continuous dosing (no cycle structure) fits the patient’s lifestyle better
  • Myelosuppression risk is a concern

Favor sunitinib when:

  • The patient has pre-existing liver disease or hepatitis history
  • The patient is taking simvastatin and switching statins is complicated
  • The patient finds the structured on/off cycle schedule psychologically easier to manage
  • Thyroid function monitoring is less of a concern than liver monitoring

Bottom line

COMPARZ established these two drugs as clinically equivalent in efficacy — the choice between them is almost entirely a quality-of-life and toxicity-profile decision rather than an efficacy one. Pazopanib’s better patient preference scores (driven by less fatigue and fewer mouth sores) and continuous dosing convenience are balanced against its more serious liver toxicity signal. The broader question of whether an immunotherapy-based combination should come first is worth discussing with your oncologist before this comparison becomes the primary decision.

Why does pazopanib cause liver enzyme elevation and how is it monitored?

Pazopanib’s liver enzyme elevation is one of the most mechanistically interesting hepatotoxicity patterns in oncology — because unlike some drug-induced liver injuries that are idiosyncratic and unpredictable, pazopanib’s hepatotoxicity has a partly understood genetic basis that explains why some patients are affected much more than others.


The mechanism — UGT1A1 and bilirubin competition

Pazopanib is metabolized in the liver and inhibits a key enzyme called UGT1A1 (UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1) — the same enzyme responsible for conjugating bilirubin so it can be excreted. When UGT1A1 is inhibited, bilirubin processing slows and indirect bilirubin accumulates in the bloodstream.

Separately, pazopanib also causes direct hepatocellular stress — elevating liver transaminases (ALT and AST) through mechanisms that involve mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in liver cells, pathways shared with several other tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The combination of these two mechanisms — bilirubin processing disruption plus direct hepatocellular injury — is what produces the distinctive mixed picture of liver enzyme elevation seen with pazopanib.


The genetic component — UGT1A1 polymorphisms

This is what makes pazopanib’s hepatotoxicity particularly interesting: patients who carry certain variants of the UGT1A1 gene — specifically the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism, which reduces UGT1A1 enzyme activity — experience significantly greater bilirubin elevation than those with normal UGT1A1 function.

This same genetic variant is associated with Gilbert’s syndrome, a common benign condition where individuals have mildly elevated bilirubin levels at baseline due to reduced UGT1A1 activity. Patients with Gilbert’s syndrome — or who unknowingly carry the UGT1A1*28 variant — are at higher risk of pronounced bilirubin elevation on pazopanib.

In clinical practice, routine UGT1A1 genotyping before pazopanib isn’t universally recommended, but for patients with known Gilbert’s syndrome or unexpectedly high baseline bilirubin, it becomes a relevant consideration worth discussing.


Why the first 18 weeks matter most

The prescribing information’s specific statistic — that 92.5% of all transaminase elevations of any grade occur within the first 18 weeks — reflects the natural history of pazopanib-related hepatotoxicity. Most liver enzyme elevations:

  • Begin within the first 3 months of treatment
  • Peak and then stabilize or improve with dose adjustment
  • Rarely emerge as a new finding after 18 weeks in patients who have been tolerating the drug well

This time-concentrated risk profile is why monitoring intensity is front-loaded — it’s not arbitrary caution distributed evenly across years of treatment, but a specific early window where vigilance matters most.


Why simvastatin amplifies the risk

Simvastatin is itself metabolized through the liver via CYP3A4, and both pazopanib and simvastatin compete for hepatic processing pathways and can independently cause liver enzyme elevation. The combination creates an additive hepatotoxic burden — the prescribing information specifically names this interaction and recommends caution or switching to an alternative statin (pravastatin or rosuvastatin are generally preferred as lower-interaction alternatives).


How monitoring is structured

Before starting:
Baseline ALT, AST, and bilirubin are measured to establish the patient’s starting point. If baseline values are already elevated (from pre-existing liver disease, hepatitis, or other causes), a risk-benefit discussion occurs before proceeding, and some patients may need a reduced starting dose.

During the first 18 weeks:
Most centers monitor liver function tests every 4 weeks — approximately monthly — through the high-risk window. Some centers monitor every 2 weeks in the first 2 months given the concentration of early events.

After 18 weeks:
Monitoring typically continues but at a lower frequency — every 6–8 weeks or at each clinical visit — since the acute risk period has passed.


How results guide dose decisions

The prescribing information provides specific thresholds that guide clinical action:

Mild ALT elevation (up to 3 times the upper limit of normal / ULN) with normal bilirubin — continue treatment with more frequent monitoring.

ALT 3–8 times ULN — interrupt pazopanib until improvement, then consider restarting at a reduced dose (400mg daily).

ALT greater than 8 times ULN, or any ALT elevation combined with bilirubin greater than 2 times ULN — permanently discontinue pazopanib. This combination pattern (elevated transaminases plus elevated bilirubin) is sometimes called “Hy’s Law” — a well-recognized marker of serious drug-induced liver injury with a meaningful risk of progression to liver failure.


Symptoms worth knowing

Most mild-to-moderate liver enzyme elevations cause no symptoms — they’re detected on routine blood tests, which is exactly why scheduled monitoring matters rather than waiting for symptoms. When symptoms do develop, they typically signal more significant liver involvement:

  • Yellowing of skin or whites of eyes (jaundice)
  • Dark urine (like strong tea or cola)
  • Pale or clay-colored stools
  • Severe right-sided or upper abdominal pain or tenderness
  • Unusual fatigue disproportionate to disease or treatment burden
  • Nausea and vomiting not otherwise explained

Any of these in a patient on pazopanib should prompt urgent liver function testing rather than watchful waiting — because the Hy’s Law combination can progress rapidly if the drug isn’t stopped promptly.


The practical takeaway

Pazopanib’s hepatotoxicity is more predictable in its timing (concentrated in the first 18 weeks), partly predictable in its risk factors (UGT1A1 variants, simvastatin co-use, pre-existing liver disease), and manageable through structured monitoring and dose adjustment — but it requires active engagement rather than passive observation. The monitoring schedule isn’t bureaucratic checkbox medicine; it’s the mechanism by which a potentially serious complication is caught early enough to intervene before it becomes irreversible.

Medical disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Osimertinib is a prescription medication that must only be used under the supervision of a qualified oncologist. Clinical outcomes data is drawn from published Phase III trials; individual results vary. Always consult your healthcare provider and refer to the full prescribing information before making any treatment decisions. Emergency: call your local emergency services or poison control immediately if you experience serious adverse effects.